The international community is creating a new entity, the Green Climate Fund, to channel up to $100bn a year to climate solutions in developing countries. In this paper, GAIA uses concrete examples from the waste sector to show why these funds should flow to the informal sector, grassroots groups, and city administrations and not to multinational firms. The benefits of such grassroots-led waste management include lower greenhouse gas emissions, higher employment rates, better working conditions and reduced toxic pollution; whereas the corporate approach tends to lead to increased emissions and economic displacement.

News and Current Campaigns

PRESS RELEASE: U.S. Mayors Stand Up to Incinerator... In blow to the polluting incinerator industry, 250 mayors unanimously vote for renewable energy plan that does not include municipal waste burning F...
Broad Opposition to state money for burning waste UPDATE! (Dated June 16, 2017) Thank you all for your advocacy to help stop subsidization for incineration in California! In the spring, you helped...
No Renewable Energy Incentives for Burning Plastic Consensus statement for genuine and effective Feed-In Tariffs and other Renewable Energy subsidies We the undersigned declare that using renewa...
Why the NGT Okhla Order Sets a Bad Precedent for I... This article was originally posted by The Wire — see original here. NGT‘s judgment on Okhla incinerator plant case - A judicial overreach! The Ok...