Aiming
for |
|
 |
ten
steps to get started at the local level |
|
|
| Every
community is different. There is no one way to prevent,
reduce, reuse, recycle, or compost discarded materials.
For instance, manual sorting of recyclables may be
appropriate in one community and not in another. The
ten steps listed below are applicable to most if not
all communities interested in pursuing a zero waste
future. A community group or local government can
take any step to get started. These steps are not
mutually exclusive. Integrating community participation
in decision-making will enhance the success of any
discard management program. This plan can be adopted
at the community, municipal, or national level, depending
on which approach will yield the best results in each
situation. Also, one can work with many communities
to adopt local zero waste goals, and the momentum
generated can lead towards an eventual citywide or
even national goal.
1.
Adopt a non-incineration discard management plan.
Better yet call it a resource management plan and
embrace zero waste as a vision for the future. Make
waste prevention, reuse, repair, recycling, and composting
the heart of the plan. Adopt waste elimination goals
as well as recycling goals. Provide leadership, dialogue,
and information on how to move toward a zero waste
economy. Decide against privatizing and centralizing
waste systems. Seek public input to build broad public
support for waste reduction programs and build a network
of stakeholders to be involved in the design and implementation
of the programs. Make community participation meaningful.
2.
Decentralize waste management by building on local
community initiatives using local resources and accommodating
the informal sector. Community projects do not need
to be relegated to local small efforts. Replicate
and expand successful community initiatives. Provide
them with an institutional structure that will allow
them to thrive and become mainstream (for example,
earmark land for composting activities). Allow for
decentralized functioning and community efforts rather
than an emphasis on one central initiative to solve
all
waste problems.
3.
Target a wide range of materials for reuse, recycling,
and composting (especially several grades of paper
and all types of organics) and keep these materials
segregated at the source from mixed trash to maintain
quality and enhance diversion levels.
4.
Compost. Composting is key to achieving
50% and higher diversion levels and doing so cost-effectively.
Keeping organics and putrescibles out of landfills
will make landfills less of a nuisance and source
of pollution. Emphasize backyard or at-home composting
followed by community composting. Target many types
of clean organic materials and offer year-round, frequent,
and convenient collection.
5.
Make program participation convenient
and meaningful. The more households and businesses
participating, the more materials diverted from disposal.
More people will reduce, reuse, recycle, and compost
if programs are convenient, easy, and simple. Some
ways to make programs convenient include: |
- providing curbside
or door-to-door collection of recyclables with
the same frequency curbside collection of trash
is provided;
- providing seasonal
and frequent collection of yard trimmings;
- offering service
to all households including multi-family dwellings;
- utilizing set-out
and collection methods that encourage resident
participation as well as yield high-quality, readily
marketable materials (such as using large bins
for commingled food and beverage containers, and
separate set-outs for paper grades);
- providing adequate
containers for storage and set-out of recyclables;
and
establishing drop-off sites to augment door-to-door
collection (such as at disposal facilities if
residents or businesses self-haul trash and at
decentralized locations around the community).
|
| |
| 6.
Institute economic incentives that reward waste reduction
and recovery over disposal, such as reduced tipping
fees for delivering recyclable and compostable materials
to drop-off sites, tax incentives to encourage businesses
and haulers to recycle, and pay-as-you-throw fees for
trash collection. Eliminate any subsidies for waste
burning. |
7. Enact
or push for policies and regulations to improve the
environment for recycling and recycling-based businesses.
These might include: |
- Banning waste
incineration. Incinerators compete for the same
materials and financial resources as waste reduction
strategies and encourage wasting.
- Banning products
that cannot be reused, repaired, recycled, or
composted.
- Requiring residents
and businesses participate in recycling and composting
programs. Local ordinances can either require
residents and businesses to source-separate or
ban them from setting out designated recyclable
or compostable materials with their trash. Retain
authority over the collection and handling of
municipal discards so that haulers undertake,
encourage, and invest in recycling
- Banning recyclable
and reusable materials and products from landfills
and incinerators.
- Banning single-use
disposable products from public events and festivals
and as many other places as possible.
- Instituting
or expanding existing beverage container deposit
systems. Amend laws to require refillable containers.
- Establishing
recycling market development zones with incentives
to create industrial parks for reuse, recycling,
and composting firms.
- Instituting
building policies that require reuse and recovery
of building materials in new construction and
in building deconstruction projects.
- Establishing
a municipal, regional, or national disposal surcharge
(funds could be used to establish a Solid Waste
Reduction, Recycling, Composting Authority that
awards grants and loans to industry and nonprofit
recycling operations).
- Supporting state
and national mandates and goals, which can be
very effective in increasing recycling levels.
In the United States, state waste reduction goals,
requirements, and policies encourage governments
at the local level to implement waste reduction
programs. State beverage container deposit laws
and landfill bans on recyclables materials have,
for instance, provided recycling-based businesses
with needed materials.
- Supporting state
and national policies that will help ensure the
prices we pay for our goods and services reflect
the true cost of providing them. Policies ending
subsidies for virgin material extraction and taxing
polluting industries are examples.
- Enacting a Toxics
Use Reduction Act to encourage industries to reduce
the use of toxic materials in their processes
and products.
|
|
8.
Develop markets for materials with an eye toward closing
the loop locally (that is, within the local economy),
producing high-value end products, and linking recycling-based
economic development with a larger vision of sustainable
community development. Minimum recycled-content policies,
grant and loan programs, and recycling market development
zones have encouraged the development of recycling-based
manufacturing. Acquire public property for reuse,
recycling, and composting in order to provide a stable
land base for ecoindustrial parks and reuse and recycling
facilities. Support local nonprofit or for-profit
mission-driven recyclers and reuse operations and
the informal recycling sector. Community-based recyclers
are in business for the good of the community and
often provide services that the market undervalues.
The informal sector likewise provides undervalued
services and often does so free of charge to waste
generators and local government. Implement or expand
procurement of recycled-content products. If you’re
not buying recycled, you’re not recycling.
9.
Work to hold manufacturers responsible for their products
throughout their life-cycle. Local government can
press for extended producer responsibility (EPR) at
the state and national levels. In particular press
for state and national efforts to work with manufacturers
to voluntarily reduce packaging and meet minimum recycled-content
standards for products and packaging. If goals are
not met, push for institution of a regulatory framework.
Local government can pass producer responsibility
resolutions calling on producers to share the responsibility
for their products and on state and national legislatures
to shift the burden of managing discarded products
and packaging from local governments to the producers
of those products. Local government can also pass
local ordinances banning use and/or sale of certain
types of products and packaging that cannot be reused,
repaired, recycled, or composted.
10.
Educate, educate, educate. Education and outreach
is critical. Educational and technical assistance
programs provide residents and businesses with information
about “how” and “why” to reduce,
reuse, recycle, and compost. Launch a public information
campaign that will allow consumers to make smart choices
when making purchases. Public education campaigns
can also highlight the environmental and economic
benefits of preventing, reusing, and recycling discards
and connect the role these activities play in moving
toward a sustainable economy.
Source: Brenda Platt, Institute for Local Self-Reliance,
Washington, D.C., U.S., 2004.
|
|