Ljubljana,
25 September 2003. Slovenian NGOs Umanotera
and Dea Club today notify the Ministry of Environment,
Spatial Planning and Energy (MoE) about the
international support they have secured towards
an incineration-free waste strategy that conserves
resources and protects the environment. The
NGOs drew the attention of the MoE to the endorsement
made by more than 70 public interest groups
and individuals backing bolder waste prevention,
reduction and recycling measures and a cessation
on all types of waste incineration in Slovenia.
Led by the Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives
(www.no-burn.org), the endorsers from 31 countries
joined their counterparts in Slovenia in seeking
healthy and sustainable solutions for managing
discards.
The
Slovenian NGOs have earlier put forward several
recommendations to improve the MoE’s “Draft
Operational Programme on Waste Disposal with
Strategy on Reduction of Biodegradable Waste
to Landfill, 2003-2008” (OP). The strategic
guidelines on waste management in Slovenia,
published in 1996, are primarily orientated
on waste disposal and leans on incineration
as the “most efficient” method.
Current waste management programmes and systems
are based on these guidelines, ignoring proven
alternatives to waste disposal and incineration
that do not pollute the environment and create
much needed jobs, while decreasing the use of
often non-renewable natural resources.
“For
years, NGOs have cautioned policy makers that
waste incinerators are a source of several negative
impacts to environment and human health, and
that incineration is incompatible with strategies
aimed at higher resource efficiency. The Ministry
continually rejects those warnings, arguing
that studies are based on obsolete waste incineration
technologies. This position of the Ministry
probably explains why Slovenia still has no
study on dioxin levels in the environment and
the human body. Slovenia signed, but not yet
ratified, the Stockholm Convention. The Convention
requires parties to take measures to reduce
the total releases derived from anthropogenic
sources of unintentional Persistent Organic
Pollutants (POPs). The Treaty applies to 12
pollutants; waste incinerators are significant
sources for four of them”, said Maja Bavdaz
Solce, Chairperson, Dea Club.
“Insisting
on building the two waste incinerators in Kidricevo
and Trbovlje is a direct attack on the efforts
of local communities and other stakeholders
in the waste management chain that are working
for efficient waste segregation and recycling
in Slovenia. If plans push through, more than
50% of all waste resource will be sent to these
equipment for mass resource destruction for
the following 20 – 25 years”, added
Erika Oblak, Managing Director, Umanotera.
Umanotera
and Dea Club developed these nine recommendations
towards a sustainable waste strategy in Slovenia:
•
OP should aim for 80% waste diversion from
landfills by 2015. For that period, the moratorium
on all types of waste incineration has to
be enforced.
• OP should include measures and targets
with timetable directed at increasing the
volume of all separately collected materials,
with special emphasis on the toxic fraction
of waste.
• OP should strive for a completed study
on dioxin levels in the environment and the
human body by the end of 2004.
• OP should include the evaluation of
the potential social impacts of waste incineration
to affected regions, and consider appropriate
compensation since these regions are taking
the environmental risks.
• OP should incorporate a detailed plan
to establish an open dialogue with all interested
stakeholders on different waste management
options. It should not promote only the option
that the most powerful stakeholder considers
as adequate.
• OP should contain a proposal to integrate
extended producer responsibility into Slovenian
waste management legislation.
• OP, when evaluating the reduction
of greenhouse gas emissions, should consider
all greenhouse gases and the impact of different
waste management options.
• OP, when discussing the impact of
waste incineration on the energy production,
should conduct an exact evaluation of the
energy produced and energy lost from burning
waste, and should further take into account
the entire life-cycle of products and/or their
packaging,
• OP should estimate possibilities of
decreasing the biodegradable waste to landfill
by:
Promoting intensive segregation of biodegradable
waste at source,
Introducing backyard composting,
Building small local composting facilities,
Initiating other innovative non-combustion
treatment technologies for biodegradable waste.
Supporting information and education programmes
for local communities and households.
For
more information, please contact Erika
Oblak or visit the Umanotera website at
http://www.umanotera.org
|