Talli
Nauman , July 12, 2003, Mexico.
Like
so many summer vacationers, I took off
for the beach the day school let out,
only to be pummeled by waves crested with
discarded plastic bottles and other trash.
One
of my friends who went with me said they
ought to burn those plastic containers
before they get washed down from the hillsides
into the sea. Her mom said they ought
to bury the stuff.
I
had to break the news to them that burning
plastic is a big no-no, since it creates
dioxins, which get into air, soil, water
and food, causing cancer, immune system
damage, reproductive and developmental
problems.
Covering up the evidence under the ground
doesn’t solve anything, either;
the best way to prevent the build-up of
plastic containers is simply to avoid
them or to opt for other materials, such
as glass and aluminum, when the choice
is available. These other materials are
more readily recyclable so less likely
to end up as waste, while at the same
time their recycling reduces pressure
on limited natural resources.
But
beyond what individuals can do as consumers
to reduce proliferation of unwanted plastic
and the even worse pollution created by
burning it in the backyard, government
and industry have to get involved to a
much greater extent in minimizing this
scourge.
That’s what the Global Day of Action
on Waste and Incineration this July 14
is all about. More than 235 groups in
more than 60 countries including Mexico
are supporting the event organized by
the Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives
(GAIA).
Unlike
many worldwide environmental actions,
this one is put together outside the U.N.
auspices, as an independent initiative.
However, like its precursor event last
year in June, it is timed to coincide
with the opening day of the U.N. International
Negotiating Committee meeting in Geneva
on the implementation of the Stockholm
Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants.
In
October, Mexico signed the Stockholm treaty,
which aims to eliminate and promote the
use of alternatives to the worst toxics
known to science, including dioxins, 69
percent of which come from incineration
worldwide.
But
this year, over the protests of domestic
participants in the GAIA network, the
Mexican government passed the General
Law for Prevention and Integrated Management
of Residues, one big farce that flies
in the face of the treaty, because it
promotes the generation of dioxins by
encouraging the construction and use of
waste incinerators.
On
top of that, the government published
proposed standards at the end of last
month to facilitate operation of incinerators,
and the public only has about six weeks
left to provide input on the proposal.
More
developed countries have been shutting
down their incinerators, as scientific
findings and public pressure against the
technology have mounted. For example,
by the end of the 1990s, the 10-year-old
incinerator industry in the United States
was nearly defunct, after opposition defeated
more than 300 municipal incinerator proposals.
The
demise of the incinerator as a solution
to waste disposal is documented in Waste
Incineration: A Dying Technology, written
by Neil Tangri for GAIA’s release
on this global day of action. Among other
things, the book explains the alternatives
to incineration, beginning with the basic
tenet of reducing toxic inputs in production.
While
more technologically advanced nations
are getting away from incinerators, it
is silly for Mexico to be embracing this
disposal method, not to mention untenable
in the face of its international commitment
to the Stockholm convention. Meanwhile,
Mexico doesn’t even have a register
of the basic data about how much dioxins
and other toxic waste it is generating.
This
baseline information must be collected,
made available to the public, and used
to underpin incentives for industry to
cut down on hazardous inputs and outputs.
At the same time, the government should
follow the precautionary and preventive
principles: That is to say that the new
residues law and the corresponding standards
should be modified to shelter people and
the rest of the environment from the same
kind of harmful effects incinerators have
had in other countries.
Talli
Nauman is a founder and co-director of
Journalism to Raise Environmental Awareness,
a project initiated with support from
the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur
Foundation in 1994. Her experience includes
more than 25 years of photojournalism
in the Americas, a master's degree in
International Journalism and a bachelor's
degree in Visual and Environmental Studies.
She can be reached at jaguar@infosel.net.mx
GAIA thanks The Herald Mexico and Talli
Nauman for sharing the unpublished version
of this article with us.
|